Read Roman Republic and Brutus Essay

Read Roman Republic and Brutus Essay Read: Roman Republic and Brutus Essay Yes. Brutus clearly wishes the best for Rome, and kills Caesar out of "civic responsibility," understanding that if no one stops him, he'll become tyrant of Rome and the Republic will be over. He's the only one acting out of that conviction; most other characters in the play don not act honorably and are interested in how Caesar's death will benefit themselves. Posted by enotechris on January 2, 2009. Flag Post Message enotechris Reply to Post 3 robertwilliam Teacher College - Sophomore Educator, Debater, Expert, Dickens, The Bard Great question - and there isn't a right answer. Antony clearly doesn't think so when he juxtaposes Brutus' actions with his ideals in the funeral speech in which he - with increasing levels of irony - describes Brutus and the conspirators as an honorable man. Look, in this place ran Cassius' dagger through; See what a rent the envious Casca made; Through this the well-beloved Brutus stabb'd; And as he pluck'd his cursed steel away, Mark how the blood of Caesar follow'd it... The huge gulf between Brutus' ideals and his actions is where the problem lies. In his soliloquy he outlines that he has no "personal cause" to attack Caesar, but only the "general: he would be crowned". Yet we've seen Brutus be persuaded by Cassius, who plays absolutely on Brutus' own self-important sense of honour, and even compares Brutus with Caesar, asking "why should that name be sounded more than yours?". Is Brutus only drawn into the conspiracy ("general cause") out of self-regard and arrogance - "a personal cause"? Perhaps. And, when you compare Brutus' imperative that the conspiracy rises against Caesar's spirit, in which there "is no blood", with the blood that pours out after the assassination itself, you have to conclude that Brutus is somewhat painfully idealistic. Personally, I don't think he's honorable, but a cynical portrayal of how a self-regarding liberal can bring about absolute disaster. But whichever way you go, he's a political disaster. Posted by robertwilliam on January 2, 2009. Flag Post Message robertwilliam Reply to Post 4 afi80fl Teacher High School - 10th Grade Assistant Educator Yes, absolutely, Brutus was most definitely an honorable man. Think about his initial resistance to Cassius' advances: he asks what sort of dangerous path he is being led down. Brutus

Free Essays on The Invsible Man

In the Invisible Man the theme of blindness was constantly associated with the characters and the events. However, one had to â€Å"read between the lines† to truly understand what Ellison was telling his audience. He was not telling you why certain characters were blind in the literary sense, but for you to find the deeper meaning. Ellison simply stated the facts and allowed you, the reader, to find the truth through your own vision. In defining the theme of blindness in the novel I would have to say that the blindness was not a thing but more of an idea that represented a group of people who were too distracted and confused by society to truly see. Rather the group of individuals chooses to ignore the truth. One character that fits into this group is Brother Jack. Brother Jack was the man who proposed the offer to the narrator to join The Brotherhood, but in the end Brother Jack turned out to be a key reason why the narrator left. At the end of the novel the narrator discovers that Brother Jack has a glass eye. When the eye falls out during a meeting the narrator is surprised. â€Å"I lost my eye in the line of duty. What do you think of that?† â€Å"I don’t give a damn how you lost it as long as you keep it hidden.† (p. 475). For one individual the significance of Brother Jack having a glass eye would not be irrelevant to the theme, but it is. The meaning of Brother Jack’s glass eye was parallel to his own lost of vision. Not in the meaning of being able to see the wall or the kitchen, but in the novel’s sense of blindness. Brother Jack had portrayed himself as a man who fought for the rights of all the races and wanted all to join together in The Brotherhood. However, when the ways of society and the other committee members got to him his initial vision was lost. His glass eye represented the substitute for the real thing. In the real truth brother Jack was a dishonest and untrustworthy man. He was the substitute of the rea... Free Essays on The Invsible Man Free Essays on The Invsible Man In the Invisible Man the theme of blindness was constantly associated with the characters and the events. However, one had to â€Å"read between the lines† to truly understand what Ellison was telling his audience. He was not telling you why certain characters were blind in the literary sense, but for you to find the deeper meaning. Ellison simply stated the facts and allowed you, the reader, to find the truth through your own vision. In defining the theme of blindness in the novel I would have to say that the blindness was not a thing but more of an idea that represented a group of people who were too distracted and confused by society to truly see. Rather the group of individuals chooses to ignore the truth. One character that fits into this group is Brother Jack. Brother Jack was the man who proposed the offer to the narrator to join The Brotherhood, but in the end Brother Jack turned out to be a key reason why the narrator left. At the end of the novel the narrator discovers that Brother Jack has a glass eye. When the eye falls out during a meeting the narrator is surprised. â€Å"I lost my eye in the line of duty. What do you think of that?† â€Å"I don’t give a damn how you lost it as long as you keep it hidden.† (p. 475). For one individual the significance of Brother Jack having a glass eye would not be irrelevant to the theme, but it is. The meaning of Brother Jack’s glass eye was parallel to his own lost of vision. Not in the meaning of being able to see the wall or the kitchen, but in the novel’s sense of blindness. Brother Jack had portrayed himself as a man who fought for the rights of all the races and wanted all to join together in The Brotherhood. However, when the ways of society and the other committee members got to him his initial vision was lost. His glass eye represented the substitute for the real thing. In the real truth brother Jack was a dishonest and untrustworthy man. He was the substitute of the rea...

Comerical law. sale of goods Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Comerical law. sale of goods - Case Study Example Under this UCC, John can claim that ABC’s president promised him that they roofing sheets were of high quality through the phone call and that is why he opted to buy them (Cornell University Law School 1). John can claim that the roofing sheets did not meet the fitness purposes for which goods of the kind of roofing sheets he wanted to buy meet. Such roofing sheets should be able to withstand poor weather. The roofing sheets lacked freedom from minor defects; they endanger the lives of the workers in the company safe and its durability was short term. John can file a claim against all these factors since ABC’s president promised him that all these issues will be addressed yet they were not (Hooley 19). If someone has been sold a faulty product, then they are lawfully entitled to claim from the seller any direct expenses that they have incurred (Adams 53). John can, therefore, file a claim on the expense of restoring back his company. This includes the $125,000 spent on the new roofing and the roughly $200,000 lost on damages by the previously damaged